|
Post by ZolliesFollies on Sept 21, 2021 18:24:17 GMT
As the poll says, should we carry on with the current system (highest total value) or switch to highest annual average value? Benefits of sticking with the current system: - We're all familiar with it
- With current $500k/$1M contract increments, math is maybe a bit easier
- Emphasis on longer contracts leads to more static rosters
Benefits of switching to annual average:
- Makes bids more realistic--$20M over 1 year would beat $21M over 4 years, as it should
- Easier to see rough impact of contracts on salary caps
- Encourages shorter contracts, resulting in more player movement
Yes, some of the benefits of each are exact opposites, as it's all a matter of personal perspective.
Obviously this would have to be discussed/voted/approved for a future season, just thought I'd see what folks think.
|
|
|
Post by tunesquad on Sept 21, 2021 18:27:32 GMT
Are any of these actually up for a potential change? Like has Javy commented on any of these?
|
|
|
Post by GreySkull Masters on Sept 21, 2021 18:29:12 GMT
Are any of these actually up for a potential change? Like has Javy commented on any of these? I wrote all these up in a singular message and he told me to make polls but, he has not been forth coming with his opinions.
|
|